中西医结合治疗咽喉反流合并咽喉炎的临床疗效
作者简介:

魏春晖,Email:weichunh@sina.com


Effect of combination of Chinese and Western Medicine on the treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease complicated with laryngopharyngitis
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
    摘要:

    目的探讨雷贝拉唑与多潘立酮联合中药西青果颗粒对咽喉反流(laryngo pharyngeal reflux, LPR)合并咽喉炎患者的治疗效果,及对症状缓解和生活质量的影响。方法回顾性分析2014年3月~2015年5月接受治疗的LPR合并咽喉炎患者的临床资料,根据其治疗方式分为西药组和中西药联合治疗组,西药组采用雷贝拉唑和多潘立酮治疗,中西药联合治疗组采用雷贝拉唑、多潘立酮和西青果颗粒治疗。疗程为3个月,分析两组患者的治疗效果和不良反应发生率,比较两组患者治疗前后反流症状指数量表(feflux symptom index, RSI)评分、反流检查计分量表(reflux finding score, RFS)评分和症状缓解时间的差异。结果中西药结合组治疗的有效率(97.14%)明显高于西药组(80.00%)(χ2=5.195,P=0.023);两组患者治疗前的RSI评分无显著差异(P>0.05),治疗后中西药结合组患者的声嘶或发声问题、清喉和咽喉黏液增多等维度得分均低于西药组(P<0.05);两组患者治疗前的RFS评分无显著差异(P>0.05),治疗后中西药结合组患者的声门下水肿、喉室消失和红斑、充血等维度得分均低于西药组(P<0.05);中西药结合组患者咽部异物感、慢性咳嗽、反复清嗓和声嘶缓解时间明显短于西药组(t=30.589、12.928、8.615和9.803,P<0.001);两组肝肾功能受损、腹胀和倦怠发生率无显著差异(χ2=0.008,P=0.930)。结论中西药结合对咽喉反流合并咽喉炎有较好的疗效,可明显改善临床症状和体征,降低不良反应发生率,具有临床应用价值。

    Abstract:

    ObjectiveTo explore the effect of combination of rabeprazole, domperidone and Xiqingguo granule for the treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) complicated with laryngopharyngitis.MethodsThe clinical data of 75 patients with LPR complicated with pharyngitis treated in our hospital from March 2014 to May 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the treatment methods, the patients were divided into western medicine treatment group (n=40) and combined treatment group (n=35). To the patients of the western medicine treatment group, rabeprazole and domperidone were administrated orally. For those of the combined treatment group, Xiqingguo granule (a traditional Chinese medicine preparation) was administrated in addition with rabeprazole and domperidone. The course of treatment was 3 months for both groups. Their therapeutic effects were evaluated and the incidences of adverse reactions were analyzed. The differences of reduction in reflux symptom index (RSI), reflux finding score (RFS) and symptom alleviating time between the two groups were compared.ResultsThe effective rate of the combined treatment group was 97.14%, which was significantly higher than that of the western medicine treatment group (80.00%) (χ2=5.195, P=0.023). The difference of RSI before treatment between the two groups was statistically insignificant (P>0.05). After treatment, the scores of hoarseness or vocal problems, clearing throat and excess throat mucus of the combination treatment group were lower than those of the western medicine treatment group (all P<0.05). The difference of RFS before treatment between the two groups was also statistically insignificant (P>0.05). After treatment, the scores of subglottic edema, ventricular obliteration, erythema and hyperemia of the combination treatment group were lower than those of the western medicine treatment group (all P<0.05). The symptom alleviating time for globus sensation, chronic cough, clearing throat and hoarseness of the combination treatment group was significantly shorter than that of the western medicine treatment group respectively (all P<0.001). The difference of the incidence rate of adverse reactions including impaired kidney and liver function, abdominal distension and tiredness between the two groups were statistically insignificant (χ2=0.008, P=0.930).ConclusionWith advantages of dramatically improving clinical symptoms and signs, and reducing the incidence of adverse reactions, the combination of traditional Chinese medicine and western medicine shows good curative effect for LPR complicated with laryngopharyngitis, so it is worthy of clinical application.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

魏春晖.中西医结合治疗咽喉反流合并咽喉炎的临床疗效[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志,2017,23(3):226-229

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-06-30
温馨提示

本刊唯一投稿网址:www.xyosbs.com
唯一办公邮箱:xyent@126.com
编辑部联系电话:0731-84327210,84327469
本刊从未委托任何单位、个人及其他网站代理征稿及办理其他业务联系,谨防上当受骗!

关闭