咽喉反流性疾病患者食管上括约肌压力高分辨测量的诊断价值
作者简介:

郑城婷,Email: 1432785103@qq.com

基金项目:

2019年四川省卫生健康委员会科研课题(19PJ027)。


Diagnostic value of highresolution manometry of upper esophageal sphincter pressure in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
    摘要:

    目的分析咽喉反流性疾病(LPRD)患者食管上括约肌(UES)压力高分辨测量(HRM)的应用价值。方法对71例咽部异感患者及28例健康志愿者进行UES压力HRM,根据反流症状指数(RSI)量表评分将71例患者分为咽喉反流组(A组,31例,RSI>13分)及非咽喉反流组(B组,40例,RSI≤13分),健康志愿者为C组(28例)。A、B、C组性别构成、平均年龄及平均体质指数(BMI)经比较差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05),具有可比性。结果3组生活质量评价量表(SF36)评分A组患者(91.44±4.17)分显著低于B组的(99.51±5.86)分及C组的(114.03±5.29)分(P均<0.05);平均UES静息压A组为(104.50±33.84)mmHg,B组为(76.34±20.08) mmHg,C组为(46.92±11.56)mmHg, A组与B、C组比较差异均具有统计学意义(P均<0.05);残余压A组为(26.31±8.27)mmHg,B组为(15.40±7.19)mmHg, C组为(10.25±4.74)mmHg, A组与B、C组比较差异均具有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。A、B、C组平均远端收缩积分(DCI)及平均远端潜伏期(DL),经比较差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论LPRD患者生活质量评分较低,其症状的出现可能与UES静息压及残余压增高有关,UES静息压及残余压测量可为LPRD的诊断及其预后判断提供一定的参考价值。

    Abstract:

    ObjectiveTo analyze the clinical value of highresolution manometry (HRM) of the pressure of the upper esophageal sphincter(UES) in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD).Methods71 patients with pharyngeal paraesthesia symptoms and 28 normal subjects underwent HRM of UES pressure. On the basis of RSI score, 71 patients were divided into pharyngeal reflux group (group A, 31 cases, RSI>13 points) and without pharyngeal reflux group (group B, 40 cases, RSI ≤ 13 points), normal subjects group(group C,28 cases). There was no statistical difference in sex ratio, mean age and BMI among the three groups (all P>0.05).ResultsThe SF36 score in group A (91.44±4.17) was obviously lower than that in group B (99.51±5.86) and in group C (114.03±5.29) (all P<0.05). The mean USE resting pressure of three groups were (104.50±33.84) mmHg(group A), (76.34±20.08) mmHg(group B) and (46.92±11.56) mmHg(group C) respectively, and which was significantly higher in group A than in group B and C (P<0.05). The mean residual pressure of three groups were (26.31±8.27) mmHg(group A), (15.40±7.19) mmHg(group B) and (10.25±4.74) mmHg (group C)respectively, and which was significantly higher in group A than in group B and C(all P<0.05). The average distal contraction integral (DCI) and distal latency (DL) in three groups were no statistically significant.ConclusionThe life quality score of patients with LPRD was lower, and the onset of the symptoms might be correlated with the increasing resting pressure and residual pressure of UES. The measurement of UES resting pressure and residual pressure could be valuable for the diagnosis and prognosis of LPRD.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘俊伟,郑城婷,郑仕诚,张恒.咽喉反流性疾病患者食管上括约肌压力高分辨测量的诊断价值[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志,2020,26(4):443-447

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-08-27
温馨提示

本刊唯一投稿网址:www.xyosbs.com
唯一办公邮箱:xyent@126.com
编辑部联系电话:0731-84327210,84327469
本刊从未委托任何单位、个人及其他网站代理征稿及办理其他业务联系,谨防上当受骗!

关闭