鼻内镜下高选择性翼管神经切断术治疗变应性鼻炎
作者:
基金项目:

深圳市自然科学基金基础研究项目(JCYJ20180302144624391)。


Endoscopic highly selective vidian neurotomy for the treatment of allergic rhinitis
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • | |
    摘要:

    目的 分析鼻内镜下高选择性翼管神经切断术对中重度持续变应性鼻炎(AR)的疗效和安全性。方法 选取2018年1月—2019年9月华中科技大学协和深圳医院就诊的伴中重度持续性AR的鼻中隔偏曲患者60例为研究对象,依据随机数字表法分成对照组(26例)和治疗组(34例)。对照组患者采取鼻内镜鼻中隔矫正术治疗鼻中隔偏曲,治疗组在鼻中隔矫正基础上开展高选择性翼管神经切断,包含鼻后神经及翼管神经咽支切断术,术后1、3、6个月对患者进行定期随访,分别对两组患者手术前后鼻炎用药评分(TRMS)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、鼻结膜炎生活质量量表(RQLQ)评分进行评估,并记录患者局部、全身不良反应出现情况。结果 随访6个月,对研究终止时随访成功且临床资料完整的46例患者进行分析,其中治疗组26例,对照组20例。两组患者术前TRMS、VAS及RQLQ评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组患者术后1、3、6个月VAS及RQLQ评分与治疗前比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),且治疗组术后1、3、6个月VAS及RQLQ评分评分低于对照组,术后3、6个月TRMS评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。两组患者术后1个月的TRMS评分对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对照组手术前后TRMS评分对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),治疗组术后3、6个月TRMS评分低于术前(P<0.05)。治疗组并发症发生和对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 鼻内镜下高选择性翼管神经切断术是治疗中重度持续性AR一种安全、有效的手术方式。

    Abstract:

    Objective To analyze the clinical effect and safety of endoscopic highly selective vidian neurotomy on the treatment of moderate to severe persistent allergic rhinitis (PAR).Methods Sixty patients suffering from nasal septal deviation combined with moderate to severe PAR admitted to Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital from Jan 2018 to Sept 2019 were selected. All the patients were randomly divided into control group (n=26) and treatment group (n=34). The patients in the control group received endoscopic nasal septoplasty and those in the treatment group received endoscopic nasal septoplasty combined with highly selective vidian neurotomy including posterior nasal neurotomy and pharyngeal branch of vidian neurotomy. Total rhinitis medication scores (TRMS), visual analogue scale (VAS) and rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire (RQLQ) scores as well as incidences of local and systemic adverse reactions between the two groups were compared at the timepoints before treatment, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment.Results Forty-six cases were followed up for 6 months postoperatively and had complete general data, including 26 in the treatment group and 20 in the control group. Before treatment, the differences of TRMS, VAS and RQLQ scores between the two groups were statistically insignificant (all P>0.05).One month, 3 and 6 months after treatment, the differences of VAS and RQLQ scores between the two groups were statistically significant (all P<0.05), and VAS and RQLQ scores of the treatment group were lower than those of the control. Three and 6 months after treatment, TRMS scores of the treatment group were lower than those of the control group (all P<0.05), while the difference of TRMS score in one month after treatment was statistically insignificant (P>0.05). The differences of pre- and postoperative TRMS in the control group were statistically insignificant (P>0.05), while the TRMS scores in 3 months and 6 months after treatment were lower than those before treatment in the treatment group (P<0.05). The difference of complication rate between the two groups was statistically insignificant (P>0.05).Conclusion The endoscopic highly selective vidian neurotomy is safe and effective for the treatment of moderate to severe PAR.

    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
    参考文献
    [1] 中国过敏性鼻炎研究协作组.过敏性鼻炎皮下免疫治疗专家共识2015[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2015, 22(8):379-404.
    [2] Bousquet J, Khaltaev N, Cruz AA, et al. Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma (ARIA) 2008 update (incollaboration with the World Health Organization GA2LEN and Allergen)[J].Allergy, 2008, 63(Suppl 86):8-160.
    [3] Bousquet J, Bachert C, Csnonica GW, et al. Unmet needs in severe chronic upper airway disease (SCUAD)[J].J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2009, 124(3):428-433.
    [4] 章如新.变应性鼻炎的外科治疗[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2020, 34(1):1-4.
    [5] 赵娜.翼管神经切断术的研究进展[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志, 2016, 22(1):81-84.
    [6] 何平, 金晓杰, 赵辉.低温等离子翼管神经高选择性分支切断术对变应性鼻炎患者鼻黏膜细胞中血管活性肠肽水平的影响[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2018, 32(3):167-170.
    [7] 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会鼻科组, 中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会鼻科学组.变应性鼻炎诊断和治疗指南[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2016, 51(1):6-24.
    [8] Li S, Cheng J, Yang J, et al. Efficacy of posterior nasal neurectomy for allergic rhinitis combined with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps[J]. Acta Otolaryngol, 2019, 139(10):890-894.
    [9] 庞冲, 梁洁琼, 刘传合, 等.不同严重程度鼻炎患者尘螨舌下特异性免疫治疗临床效果观察[J].中国实用儿科杂志, 2020, 35(2):68-72.
    [10] Demoly P, Bousquet PJ, Mesbah K, et al. Visual analogue scale in patients treated for allergic rhinitis:an observational prospective study in primary care[J].Clin Exp Allergy, 2013, 43(8):881-888.
    [11] 黄子真, 张革化, 赵耕, 等.变应性鼻炎患者生活质量研究[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2010, 45(6):450-454.
    [12] 谭凤武, 黎可华, 邓亚萍, 等.鼻内镜下翼管神经切断术治疗中重度变应性鼻炎疗效及安全性的meta分析[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 2020, 27(6):351-356.
    [13] 王艳杰, 安云芳, 赵长青, 等.鼻内镜下单侧翼管神经切断术对变应性鼻炎合并哮喘的疗效观察[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志, 2020, 26(2):171-175.
    [14] 王建, 席庆明.切断翼管神经手术治疗变应性鼻炎36例[J].安徽医药, 2019, 23(3):561-563.
    [15] 黄钦辉, 阙镇如.鼻内镜下翼管神经切断术治疗持续性变应性鼻炎近远期疗效[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志, 2015, 7(12):95-96.
    [16] 艾金刚, 卿翔, 郜儒, 等.内镜下翼管神经切断术治疗变应性鼻炎合并支气管哮喘的疗效评估[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2020, 55(5):452-457.
    [17] 齐岩, 刘俊其, 彭舒娅, 等.鼻内镜下选择性翼管神经切断术对伴有变应性鼻炎的慢性鼻窦炎的疗效观察[J].山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(1):109-113.
    [18] 谢祚仲, 吴学文, 李茜, 等.鼻内镜下双侧翼管神经切断术对变应性鼻炎合并支气管哮喘的临床疗效观察[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志, 2013, 19(3):228-231.
    [19] 何平.鼻内镜下翼管神经切断与下鼻甲黏膜下剥离治疗过敏性鼻炎的疗效研究[J].临床和实验医学杂志, 2016, 15(23):2370-2372.
    [20] 朱梦璐, 侯冉, 赵长青, 等.翼管神经切断术与保守方式治疗中重度变应性鼻炎疗效的Meta分析[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2018, 32(15):1171-1176.
    引证文献
引用本文

刘飞,胡璟,邢枭,黄祚峰,黄丹琳,李烁.鼻内镜下高选择性翼管神经切断术治疗变应性鼻炎[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志,2021,27(4):403-407

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:417
  • 下载次数: 711
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-03
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-09-02
温馨提示

本刊唯一投稿网址:www.xyosbs.com
唯一办公邮箱:xyent@126.com
编辑部联系电话:0731-84327210,84327469
本刊从未委托任何单位、个人及其他网站代理征稿及办理其他业务联系,谨防上当受骗!

关闭