耳内镜下内衬法与夹层法鼓膜修补术的疗效观察
作者:

Curative effect of otoscopic underlay and interlay myringoplasty
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • | |
    摘要:

    目的 对耳内镜下内衬法和夹层法完成慢性化脓性中耳炎(CSOM)患者鼓膜修补术进行疗效观察。方法 回顾性分析2019年6月—2021年6月收治的经耳内镜内衬法和夹层法行鼓膜修补的CSOM患者的临床资料,共66例CSOM患者入组观察,随机分为两组由同一术者分别以内衬法(33例)和夹层法(33例)完成I型鼓室成形术。比较其鼓膜愈合情况及术后听力改善情况。结果 在内衬组(33例)鼓膜穿孔的患者中,31例愈合,愈合率为93.9%;夹层组(33例)鼓膜穿孔的患者中,32例愈合,愈合率97.0%。内衬组术前气骨导差(ABG)(21.76±9.43) dBHL,术后ABG (15.97±8.60) dBHL,平均提高6 dBHL,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P=0.011)。夹层组术前ABG (19.06±8.40) dBHL,术后ABG (12.30±7.23) dBHL,平均提高7 dBHL,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P=0.001)。结论 经耳内镜下以内衬法和夹层法行鼓膜修补术,都能达到较理想的鼓膜愈合状态及听力改善情况。耳内镜手术耗时少、术后住院日短,在耳外科领域中有极大的发展空间。

    Abstract:

    Objective To observe the curative effect of otoscopic underlay and interlay myringoplasty for chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM).Methods Clinical data of 66 CSOM patients undergoing otoscopic myringoplasty with either underlay method or interlay method between June 2019 and June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Otoscopic type I myringoplasty with either underlay method or interlay method was performed by the same surgeon (33 cases in each group). The repair feature of tympanic membrane and hearing improvement between the two groups were compared.Results Satisfactory healing of perforation was achieved in 31 patients of the underlay group with a healing rate of 93.9%, and 32 of the interlay group with a healing rate of 97.0%. The preoperative and postoperative air-bone gaps (ABGs) in the underlay group were (21.76±9.43) dBHL and (15.97±8.60) dBHL with an increase of 6 dBHL on average (P=0.011), while those in the interlay group were (19.06±8.40) dBHL, (12.30±7.23) dBHL, and 7 dBHL respectively (P=0.001).Conclusions Otoscopic type I myringoplasty with either underlay method or interlay method can achieve an ideal tympanic membrane healing and hearing improvement indistinguishably. In addition, with less operation time and short postoperative hospital stay, otoscopic surgery has vast space for development.

    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
    参考文献
    [1] Oh SJ, Goh EK, Lee HM, et al. Application of endoscopy in otology:Changes over the last 8 years in Korean Otological Society[J]. Am J Otolaryngol, 2018, 39(2):212-219.
    [2] Kozin ED, Gulati S, Kaplan AB, et al. Systematic review of outcomes following observational and operative endoscopic middle ear surgery[J]. Laryngoscope, 2015, 125(5):1205-1214.
    [3] Chong L, Head K, Webster KE, et al. Topical versus systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media[J]. Cohrane Database Syst Rev, 2021, 2(2):CD013053.
    [4] 沈宇玲, 金晓杰. 鼓膜成形术研究进展[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2007, 21(19):906-908.
    [5] Acuin J. Chronic suppurative otitis media-burden of illness and management options[C]. Geneva:WHO, 2004.
    [6] Wielinga EW, Kerr AG. Tympanosclerosis[J].Clin Otolaryngol Alied Sci, 1993, 18(5):341-349.
    [7] Holt JJ. Ear canal cholesteatoma[J]. Laryngoscope, 1992, 102(6):608-613.
    [8] Lucidi D, Reale M, Fermi M, et al. Disease-specific quality of life and psychological distress after endoscopic tympanoplasty[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2021, 21(2):1-8.
    [9] Marchioni D, Villari D, Mattioli F, et al. Endoscopic management of attic cholesteatoma:a single-institution experience[J]. Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 2013, 46(2):201-209.
    [10] Huang TY, Ho KY, Wang LF, et al. A comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic approach type 1 tympanoplasty for simple chronic otitis media[J]. J Int Adv Otol, 2016, 12(1):28-31.
    [11] He D, Shou Z, Hsieh YL et al. Endoscopic tympanoplasty without mastoidectomy for active mucosal chronic otitis media with mastoid and tympanic antrum lesions:a prospective clinical study[J].ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec, 2019, 81(5-6):287-293.
    [12] 廖天义, 周轶, 刘海森, 等. 耳内镜与显微镜下鼓室成形术手术效果的比较分析[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2021, 27(2):23-28.
    [13] Rizer FM. Overlay versus underlay tympanoplasty. Part I:historical review of the literature[J]. Laryngoscope, 1997, 107(12 Pt 2):1-25.
    [14] 潘旭, 张雄, 张杰, 等. 耳内镜下鼓膜大穿孔鼓膜修补术[C]. 中华中医药学会、世界中医药学会联合会, 中华中医药学会耳鼻喉科分会第二十五次学术年会暨世界中联耳鼻喉口腔科专业委员会第十一次学术年会论文集.济南:中华中医药学会、世界中医药学会联合会, 中华中医药学会耳鼻喉科分会, 2019:2.
    [15] Ranguis SC, Leonard CG, James AL. Prospective comparison of pediatric endoscopic lateral graft and interlay tympanoplasty[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2021, 42(6):867-875.
    [16] Ayache S. Cartilaginous myringoplasty:the endoscopic transcanal procedure[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2013, 270(3):853-860.
    [17] Furukawa T, Watanabe T, Ito T, et al. Feasibility and advantages of transcanal endoscopic myringoplasty[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2014, 35(4):e140-145.
    [18] Özdemir D, Özgür A, Akgül G, et al. Outcomes of endoscopic transcanal type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2019, 276(12):3295-3299.
    [19] Kaya I, Turhal G, Ozturk A, et al. Results of endoscopic cartilage tympanoplasty procedure with limited tympanomeatal flap incision[J]. Acta Otolaryngol, 2017, 137(11):1174-1177.
    [20] Hsu YC, Kuo CL, Huang TC. A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty[J]. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2018, 47(1):44.
    [21] Ghaffar S, Ikram M, Zia S, et al. Incorporating the endoscope into middle ear surgery[J]. Ear Nose Throat J, 2006, 85(9):593-596.
    [22] Plinkert P, Lowenheim H. Trends and perspectives in minimally invasive surgery in otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery[J]. Laryngoscope, 1997, 107(11 Pt 1):1483-1489.
    [23] Khan MM, Parab SR. Primary cartilage tympanoplasty:our technique and results[J]. Am J Otolaryngol, 2011, 32(5):381-387.
    [24] Demirci S, Tuzuner A, Karadas H, et al. Comparison of temporal muscle fascia and cartilage grafts in pediatric tympanoplasties[J]. Am J Otolaryngol, 2014, 35(6):796-799.
    [25] Yilmaz MS, Guven M, Kayabasoglu G, et al. Comparison of the anatomic and hearing outcomes of cartilage type 1 tympanoplasty in pediatric and adult patients[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2015, 272(3):557-562.
    [26] 柴永川, 杨洁, 朱伟栋, 等. 耳内镜下I型鼓室成形干湿耳手术疗效分析[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志, 2018, 24(1):24-28.
    [27] Dursun E, Demir E, Terzi S, et al. Endoscopic type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty in children[J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2020, 131:109854.
    引证文献
引用本文

潘晓丹,赵守琴,赵燕玲,李轶.耳内镜下内衬法与夹层法鼓膜修补术的疗效观察[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志,2022,28(1):69-74

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:721
  • 下载次数: 919
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-18
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-03-03
温馨提示

本刊唯一投稿网址:www.xyosbs.com
唯一办公邮箱:xyent@126.com
编辑部联系电话:0731-84327210,84327469
本刊从未委托任何单位、个人及其他网站代理征稿及办理其他业务联系,谨防上当受骗!

关闭