良性阵发性位置性眩晕患者最佳复位时机选择及急性期复位方案探讨
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Exploration of the optimal timing and acute reduction plan for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo patients
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 探究良性阵发性位置性眩晕(BPPV)患者最佳复位时机以及急性期复位方案。方法 选择2021年1月—2023年7月就诊的后半规管BPPV患者184例为研究对象;根据病程将<24 h分为A组(56例)、24 h至7 d为B组(68例)、>7 d为C组(60例),观察3组间在复位后1 d、1周、1个月内的有效率等参数;根据复位治疗方法,本组患者行Semont管石解脱法和Epley耳石复位法,其中Semont组(96例),Epley组(88例)。采用广义估计方程(GEE)评估不同治疗组患者的症状、生活质量的改善情况。结果 3组不同病程患者复位后1 d、1周后的总有效率均差异显著(P<0.05);其中B组总有效率均最高,分别为92.65%、95.59%。复位1 d、1周后,B组患者的眩晕障碍量表(DHI)评分均显著低于A、C组(P<0.05)。两组复位治疗方法相比,复位1 d、1周、1个月后Epley组患者的总有效率均更高(P<0.05);复位1 d、1周后Epley组患者的各症状评分均更低(P<0.05);复位1 d、1周后Epley组患者的DHI躯体、功能维度评分均更低(P<0.05)。GEE分析结果显示,Epley组患者复位1 d、1周后的症状、生活质量的改善情况均显著优于Semont组(P<0.05)。结论 不同病程的后半规管BPPV患者临床疗效差异显著,复位最佳时期是发病后24 h至7 d,患者体验感较好,有效率高。后半规管BPPV采取Epley法较Semont法疗效更好,能够显著改善患者的不适症状,并降低疾病对其生活的影响。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the optimal timing and acute reduction plan for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) patients. Methods A total of 184 patients with posterior semicircular canal BPPV who visited our hospital from January 2021 to July 2023 were selected as the research subjects. They were divided into group A (n=56, <24 h), group B (n=68, 24 h~7 d), and group C (n=60, >7 d) according to the course of the disease, and the effective rates and other parameters among the groups at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month after reduction were observed. According to the reduction treatment method, they were divided into Semont group (n=96) and Epley group (n=88). Generalized estimating equation (GEE) was used to evaluate the improvement of symptoms and quality of life in patients among different groups. Results There were significant differences in the total effective rates 1 day and 1 week after reduction among groups A, B, and C (P<0.05), while the total effective rates of group B were the highest, 92.65% and 95.59%, respectively. One day and 1 week after reduction, the dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) scores of patients in group B were significantly lower than those in groups A and C (P<0.05). Compared with the Semont group, patients in the Epley group had higher total effective rates 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month after reduction (P<0.05). Compared with Semont group, patients in Epley group had lower symptom scores 1 day and 1 week after reduction (P<0.05). Compared with the Semont group, patients in the Epley group had lower DHI physical and functional dimension scores after 1 day and 1 week of reduction (P<0.05). The GEE analysis results showed that the improvement in symptoms and quality of life in patients of the Epley group after 1 day and 1 week of reduction was significantly better than that of the Semont group (P<0.05). Conclusion The clinical effect of posterior semicircular canal BPPV patients with different course of disease is significantly different, and the optimal period for reduction is 24 hours to 7 days after onset of the disease, with good patient experience and high effective rate. The Epley method for reduction of posterior semicircular canal BPPV is more effective than the Semont method, which can significantly improve the patients’ discomfort symptoms and reduce the impact of the disease on the daily life.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

严森,吴文,高培.良性阵发性位置性眩晕患者最佳复位时机选择及急性期复位方案探讨[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志,2024,30(6):40-46

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-19
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-01-04
温馨提示

本刊唯一投稿网址:www.xyosbs.com
唯一办公邮箱:xyent@126.com
编辑部联系电话:0731-84327210,84327469
本刊从未委托任何单位、个人及其他网站代理征稿及办理其他业务联系,谨防上当受骗!

关闭