外中耳畸形患者骨桥植入术后听觉言语康复效果分析
作者单位:

兰州大学第二医院

基金项目:

2023年甘肃省重点研发计划项目(23YFFA0040)


Analysis of Auditory Speech Rehabilitation in Patients with External and Middle Ear Malformation after Bonebridge Implantation
Affiliation:

兰州大学第二医院

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
    摘要:

    目的 分析先天性外中耳畸形患者行骨桥植入术后听觉和言语识别能力的改善情况,评估骨桥植入的主观听觉获益。 方法 回顾性分析行单侧骨桥植入的9例先天性外中耳畸形患者的术前裸耳及术后助听听阈、言语识别阈和言语识别率,并应用言语空间听觉质量量表—父母版(SSQ-P)问卷以及言语可懂度分级标准问卷(SIR)评估患者骨桥植入后主观获益情况。结果 9例患者在骨桥植入术后的助听听阈、言语识别阈和言语识别率较术前明显改善。助听听阈在主要频率(0.25~8kHz)分别降低31.1±12.7 dB、43.9±21.5 dB、53.3±14.1 dB、45.0±12.2 dB、45.0±15.2 dB、42.2±19.1 dB,平均听阈(0.25-8kHz)下降43.4±13.0 dB,言语识别阈平均下降44.7±4.8 dB,单音节言语识别率平均提高67.3±8.2 %,双音节言语识别率平均提高68.1±8.4 %,安静环境下语句言语识别率平均提高53.3±13.5 %,噪声环境下(SNR5)语句言语识别率平均提高49.6±11.0 %。调查问卷结果显示,SSQ-P平均受益分数为4.6±0.7,SIR平均受益分数为1.4±0.4。结论 部分先天性外中耳畸形患者接受骨桥植入能获得明显听觉及言语能力改善,有效提升言语、空间和听觉的主观受益。

    Abstract:

    Objective To analyze the improvement of auditory and speech recognition in patients with congenital external and middle ear malformation after Bonebridge implantation, and evaluate the subjective auditory benefits of Bonebridge implantation. Methods 9 patients had Bonebridge implantation were retrospectively analyzed. Hearing threshold, speech recognition threshold, and speech recognition rate were recorded before and after the operation. SSQ-P and SIR were used as the test material to assess subjective benefit after Bonebridge implantation. Results The hearing aid threshold, speech recognition threshold, and speech recognition rate of 9 patients were significantly improved after Bonebridge implantation. The hearing aid threshold respectively decreased by31.1±12.7 dB、43.9±21.5 dB、53.3±14.1 dB、45.0±12.2 dB、45.0±15.2 dB、42.2±19.1 dB in the octave frequencies (0.25~8kHz). the average hearing threshold(0.25~8kHz)decreased by 43.4 ±13.0 dB, the average speech recognition threshold decreased by 44.7±4.8 dB, the average monosyllabic speech recognition rate increased by 67.3±8.2 %, the average two-syllable speech recognition rate increased by 68.1±8.4 %, the average sentence speech recognition rate in quiet environment increased by 53.3±13.5 %, and the average sentence speech recognition rate in noisy environment (SNR5) increased by 49.6±11.0 %. The questionnaire results show that the mean of SSQ-P increased by 4.6±0.7 and the mean of SIR increased by 1.4±0.4. Conclusion Some patients with congenital external and middle ear malformation received Bonebridge implantation, which can significantly improve their auditory and speech ability, and can effectively enhance their subjective benefits in terms of speech, space, and hearing.

    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
    参考文献
    [1] ????????????? Deng K, Dai L, Yi L, et al. Epidemiologic characteristics and time trend in the prevalence of anotia and microtia in China[J]. Birth Defects Research. Part A, Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 2016, 106(2): 88–94.
    [2] ????????????? Zhang T-Y, Bulstrode N, Chang K W, et al. International Consensus Recommendations on Microtia, Aural Atresia and Functional Ear Reconstruction[J]. The Journal of International Advanced Otology, 2019, 15(2): 204–208.
    [3] ????????????? Liu Y, Ren R, Zhao S. Successive ipsilateral surgery of Vibrant Soundbridge and Bonebridge devices for congenital bilateral conductive hearing loss: a case report[J]. The Journal of International Medical Research, 2020, 48(12): 300060520972280.
    [4] ????????????? Fan X, Chen Y, Niu X, et al. Outcomes of the Baha Attract System combined with auricle reconstruction in mandarin speaking patients with bilateral microtia-atresia[J]. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 2019, 139(5): 425–431.
    [5] ????????????? Miller M E. Osseointegrated Auditory Devices: Bonebridge[J]. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 2019, 52(2): 265–272.
    [6] ????????????? Lassaletta L, Calvino M, Zernotti M, et al. Postoperative pain in patients undergoing a transcutaneous active bone conduction implant (Bonebridge)[J]. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology: official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS): affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2016, 273(12): 4103–4110.
    [7] ????????????? Sprinzl G M, Wolf-Magele A. The Bonebridge Bone Conduction Hearing Implant: indication criteria, surgery and a systematic review of the literature[J]. Clinical otolaryngology: official journal of ENT-UK?; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Cervico-Facial Surgery, 2016, 41(2): 131–143.
    [8] ????????????? Shoman N M, Khan U, Hong P. Comparison of passive versus active transcutaneous bone anchored hearing devices in the pediatric population[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology - Head Neck Surgery = Le Journal D’oto-Rhino-Laryngologie Et De Chirurgie Cervico-Faciale, 2022, 51(1): 44.
    [9] ????????????? Zhao S Q, Ren R, Han D M, et al. [The implantation of Bonebridge in bilateral congenital malformation of external and middle ear][J]. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi = Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2017, 52(7): 512–516.
    [10] ????????????? Ren R, Zhao S, Wang D, et al. Audiological effectiveness of Bonebridge implantation for bilateral congenital malformation of the external and middle ear[J]. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology: official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS): affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2019, 276(10): 2755–2762.
    [11] ????????????? Seiwerth I, Fr?hlich L, Schilde S, et al. Clinical and functional results after implantation of the bonebridge, a semi-implantable, active transcutaneous bone conduction device, in children and adults[J]. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2022, 279(1): 101–113.
    [12] ????????????? Carnevale C, Morales-Olavarría C, Til-Pérez G, et al. Bonebridge? bone conduction implant. Hearing outcomes and quality of life in patients with conductive/mixed hearing loss[J]. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology: official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS): affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023, 280(4): 1611–1619.
    [13] ????????????? Ratuszniak A, Skarzynski P H, Gos E, et al. The Bonebridge implant in older children and adolescents with mixed or conductive hearing loss: Audiological outcomes[J]. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 2019, 118: 97–102.
    [14] ????????????? Auinger A B, Liepins R, Brkic F F, et al. The Functional Hearing Gain with an Active Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant Does Not Correlate with the Subjective Hearing Performance[J]. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 2022, 12(7): 1064.
    [15] ????????????? Irmer C, Volkenstein S, Dazert S, et al. The bone conduction implant BONEBRIDGE increases quality of life and social life satisfaction[J]. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology: official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS): affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022, 279(12): 5555–5563.表1 9例骨桥植入患者的基本情况病例性别植入年龄(岁)侧别耳况1男8左(术侧)听骨链畸形右外中耳畸形2女10左(术侧)外中耳畸形右外中耳畸形3女12左外中耳畸形右(术侧)听骨链畸形4女10左(术侧)外中耳畸形右外中耳畸形5女17左(术侧)听骨链畸形右听骨链畸形6男7左(术侧)听骨链畸形右听骨链畸形7女14左(术侧)外中耳畸形右外中耳畸形8女19左(术侧)听骨链畸形右外中耳畸形9女8左外中耳畸形右(术侧)外中耳畸形图1 制作适宜的骨岛图2 植入物与骨床严密耦合图3 植入体用螺钉固定完毕图4 9例患者0.5-8kHz的术前裸耳和术后助听的各频率平均听阈对比图5 患者术前裸耳与术后助听的单音节、双音节、安静环境下语句及SNR5语句言语识别率对比(%)图6 骨桥植入前后SSQ-P各子项评分及总评分
    相似文献
    引证文献
    您输入的地址无效!
    没有找到您想要的资源,您输入的路径无效!

引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:13
  • 下载次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-08
  • 最后修改日期:2024-10-08
  • 录用日期:2024-10-08
温馨提示

本刊唯一投稿网址:www.xyosbs.com
唯一办公邮箱:xyent@126.com
编辑部联系电话:0731-84327210,84327469
本刊从未委托任何单位、个人及其他网站代理征稿及办理其他业务联系,谨防上当受骗!

关闭